Can Martial Arts Training Make a Difference to Mental Health?

Matching Movement to the Individual Through Regulation, Agency and Meaning

Chris People and Daniel Mirea (23 October 2026)
| The NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ Journal |

Introduction

Combat training and mental health hardly seem to belong in the same sentence. The connection is counterintuitive. Combat suggests aggression, confrontation and the possibility of harm. Concerns about injury, including brain injury in activities involving head contact, are real and deserve attention (Neidecker et al., 2019). Why, then, consider martial arts within a discussion of psychological wellbeing?

To a keen observer, the answer may emerge through the training itself. What becomes apparent is how much attention is given to the art: learning movement, judging distance, coordinating effort, responding to another person and exercising control. In a supportive training environment, these abilities develop gradually, with the intensity and physical demands adjusted as the participant gains familiarity and skill.

Martial arts also have a substantial interpersonal dimension. Individual practice is important, but partner exercises introduce something different: another person whose movement, timing and response cannot always be fully predicted. The participant must attend, interpret and act while remaining aware of their own reactions. They may need to communicate a limit, request a slower pace, accept correction or manage the frustration of getting something wrong.

Breathing is often part of this learning. In some traditions, explicit instruction in breathing accompanies the development of posture, movement and control from an early stage. Japanese martial traditions may direct focused attention towards the hara, while Chinese practices such as Tai Chi emphasise the lower dantian, traditionally understood as a centre of vital energy (Mai, 2015; National Qigong Association, 2025). These concepts provide ways of organising attention around the abdomen, breathing and coordinated movement. Breathing becomes something to notice and coordinate with action, particularly as effort and intensity change.

Figure 1: Karate meditation (mokusล): bringing attention to the hara (the lower abdomen) through an upright, relaxed posture and gentle abdominal breathing.

Attention, bodily awareness, breathing, gradual engagement with discomfort and responsiveness to others are also familiar concerns within mindfulness and emotional regulation approaches. Their presence in martial arts makes the clinical connection worth exploring. What might a participant be learning psychologically while practising physically? Could these experiences be connected more deliberately with therapeutic goals?

Our observations and individual experiences suggest that participants can learn more than the execution of a technique. Someone who initially responds with excessive tension, hurried movement or withdrawal may gradually become more able to pause, direct attention, adjust effort and choose what to do next. Another may discover that asking for help or expressing a boundary allows participation to continue. These experiences may acquire psychological significance even when neither instructor nor participant describes them in therapeutic language.

From a NeuroAffective-CBT perspective, lifestyle interventions are an essential part of promoting health and resilience. We propose that appropriately selected martial arts training may provide a practical setting for rehearsing regulation and agency. The relevant learning will differ between individuals. It may involve remaining engaged while uncomfortable, responding less harshly to mistakes, exercising restraint or recognising when to stop. These possibilities depend on the training environment, the quality of instruction and the meaning the person gives to participation.

Matching movement to the individual is therefore central. Preferences, physical capacity, cultural meaning, access and recovery all influence whether an activity is suitable and sustainable. The same exercise may offer one person an experience of capability while becoming another demand through which someone else judges or punishes themselves. Understanding that difference belongs within therapeutic formulation.

This selective narrative review brings together exercise and martial arts research with clinical reasoning and observations from training. Drawing on NeuroAffective-CBT alongside established cognitive behavioural approaches, we examine how chosen and adapted participation might support attention, coping self-instruction, assertiveness, mastery and belonging. A hypothetical clinical illustration shows how physical practice can be connected with a specific prediction, collaborative review and an experiment outside training.

The wider exercise literature supports therapeutic relevance, while evidence specific to martial arts remains heterogeneous. Our observations inform the proposed applications rather than establish their effectiveness. The question is how particular forms of training, matched to the individual and delivered within suitable conditions, might support mental health and whether what is learned during practice becomes available in everyday life.

Keywords: martial arts; combat sports; lifestyle interventions; cognitive behavioural therapy; NeuroAffective-CBT; emotional regulation; agency; psychological flexibility; therapeutic learning.

Martial Arts and the Cultivation of Mind and Body

Organised combat practices have a documented history extending across millennia and cultures. Wrestling entered the ancient Olympic programme in 708 BCE, boxing in 688 BCE and pankration, which combined striking and wrestling, in 648 BCE. These dates concern their inclusion in the Games rather than the origins of combat practice, but they demonstrate the longstanding place of fighting skills within organised physical culture (Foundation of the Hellenic World, n.d.).

The history of Chinese martial arts provides a further connection between physical practice, cultural meaning and self-cultivation. Shahar (2008) documents the involvement of Shaolin monks in seventh-century military events and traces the subsequent development of their martial traditions. This history encompasses armed and unarmed practices, religious commitments and relationships with political institutions. Later developments also connected martial practice with therapeutic purposes. Shaolin represents one important tradition within a diverse history, illustrating how fighting skills could become associated with broader understandings of health, discipline and personal development.

In the twentieth century, Bruce Lee brought the relationship between martial practice and personal philosophy to a wide international audience. His reflections emphasised adaptability, self-expression and learning through experience. His water metaphor presented responsiveness as an alternative to rigidly imposing a predetermined form. These ideas offer a philosophical connection with contemporary interests in psychological flexibility and agency, although Lee was articulating a philosophy of practice rather than a clinical treatment model (Bruce Lee Enterprises, n.d.).

Accounts of Leeโ€™s recovery following a serious back injury add a personal dimension to this relationship. His family describes pain and emotional difficulty, extensive study, rest and a cautious return to movement. This account illustrates purposeful engagement with physical limitation, bringing reflection, learning and action together. It remains a biographical account rather than evidence that determination or self-instruction alone repaired the injury (Bruce Lee Enterprises, 2017).

Clinical interest in these connections also has an established history. Fuller (1988) discussed parallels between martial arts and psychotherapeutic concepts, including possible clinical applications. Twemlow and Sacco (1998) described therapeutic applications with adolescents presenting with violent behaviour. These contributions provide a foundation for asking how particular experiences within training might become relevant to an individualโ€™s psychological difficulties and treatment goals.

Beyond the instruction to exercise

Recommending exercise can leave the main therapeutic problem untouched. A person may understand that movement could help and still feel unable to enter a gym, tolerate being a beginner or return after a difficult first session. Shame, fatigue, anticipated judgement and practical barriers can make an apparently simple recommendation difficult to act upon.

Clinical work therefore needs to address how participation becomes possible and what the person learns through it. A correction might be interpreted as evidence of inadequacy or as ordinary assistance in learning. Asking for a pause might feel humiliating or become an experience of effective choice.

The same activity can serve different functions. Training may support curiosity and connection, reinforce punitive standards or provide temporary escape from distress. Its therapeutic significance depends on the personโ€™s formulation and experience. Salkovskis et al. (2023) describe therapy in terms of a shared understanding that is tested to enable more flexible responding. Applied to movement, this directs attention to the expectations being examined and the responses being practised.

Established approaches such as graded engagement, behavioural experiments and coping rehearsal provide methods for connecting physical practice with psychological learning. NeuroAffective-CBT offers one organising perspective for considering bodily regulation, protective responses and embodied rehearsal within this work.

Scope and approach

This selective narrative review is intended primarily for clinicians working with adults. Sources are brought together according to their relevance to exercise outcomes, martial arts and boxing, participation and candidate psychological processes. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses inform the evidence overview; selected trials and conceptual publications address particular clinical questions. The synthesis is purposive and does not claim exhaustive coverage or an independent formal quality appraisal.

General exercise findings are distinguished from evidence concerning particular disciplines and interventions. Outcomes are also distinguished from the mechanisms proposed to explain them. NeuroAffective-CBT publications provide conceptual and practitioner perspectives rather than independent empirical validation of the integrated approach.

The clinical proposals additionally draw on the authorsโ€™ observations and individual experiences of training. These inform hypothesis development rather than constitute systematically collected outcome data. The worked illustration is hypothetical, and no original patient data are reported.

What participants actually do

Martial arts and combat sports overlap, but neither label defines a uniform intervention. Traditional forms, non-contact boxing, recreational grappling and competitive mixed martial arts involve different movements, expectations and exposures. A practice may emphasise cultural tradition, self-defence, fitness or competition.

For clinical interpretation, important distinctions concern contact, sparring, exertion, instruction and freedom to stop. Shadowboxing and pad work can use striking movements without participants receiving blows. Grappling involves close physical contact and its own injury exposures. Recreational training and competition can differ substantially even within one club.

The learning environment matters alongside these physical ingredients. An instructor who welcomes questions and adapts tasks creates different opportunities from one who treats uncertainty or stopping as weakness. Community membership, traditional philosophy and shared rituals may matter in some settings and be absent in others.

An individualised recommendation therefore needs to specify what the person will do, with whom, under which conditions and for what purpose. The clinical applications discussed here concern mainly recreational training and adapted non-contact activities. Contact and competition remain separate choices rather than necessary stages of therapeutic progress.

What the exercise evidence supports

Physical activity has a substantial evidence base in mental health. Singh et al. (2023) brought together 97 systematic reviews covering 1,039 trials and 128,119 participants, reporting improvements in depression, anxiety and psychological distress across varied adult populations. However, 77 reviews received a critically low AMSTAR-2 methodological quality rating. These ratings concern the reviews rather than 77 individual trials.

Noetel et al. (2024) found benefits for several exercise modalities in depression, including walking or jogging, yoga and strength training, with confidence in estimates limited by study quality and other uncertainties. Gordon et al. (2018) identified an average reduction in depressive symptoms across 33 resistance-training trials involving 1,877 participants.

The evidence supports considering several forms of movement while leaving their selection and delivery open to individual planning. An advantage over inactivity or usual care may reflect structure, encouragement, expectation and social contact as well as exertion. Comparison with another credible activity asks a more specific question about relative benefit.

White et al. (2024) reviewed 247 studies examining mediators and moderators of the relationship between physical activity and mental health. Their synthesis identified support for self-esteem, self-efficacy, physical self-worth and social connection, with more qualified support for mastery and mindfulness. Most included studies were observational. These findings identify plausible processes for investigation while leaving uncertainty about causal pathways in an individual client.

Evidence specific to martial arts and boxing

Moore et al. (2020) synthesised 14 studies and reported a small pooled benefit for wellbeing and a moderate pooled effect on internalising mental health outcomes. Heterogeneity was substantial, particularly for internalising outcomes, and the pooled aggression finding was not statistically significant.

Ciaccioni et al. (2024) reviewed 72 observational adult studies, comprising 70 cross-sectional and two longitudinal studies. Findings varied across self-related, emotional and cognitive outcomes. The designs limit conclusions about whether differences resulted from training, pre-existing characteristics or continued participation by people who found the activity helpful.

Non-contact boxing is a closer comparison for interventions using pads, bags and combinations. Bozdarov et al. (2023) identified 16 studies across diverse populations and delivery formats. In 56%, boxing was supplemented by components such as mentoring, mindfulness or psychological strategies. The review maps promising applications, but the mixture of designs and combined interventions prevents a firm estimate of boxingโ€™s independent contribution.

Weiss et al. (2025) provide a recent clinical example. Their 24-person pilot examined taekwondo and mindfulness within a dialectical behaviour therapy intensive outpatient programme. Participants reported favourable acceptability and immediate affective changes. The small within-subject study, conducted during ongoing treatment, supports feasibility and further investigation.

Together, these findings support studying specified practices in defined contexts. They leave open which components contribute to change and how outcomes compare with other meaningful activities.

Lifestyle interventions within NeuroAffective-CBT

Lifestyle interventions address recurring conditions of daily life that affect wellbeing and participation. Sleep, movement, nutrition, hydration and recovery can influence one another. Fatigue may reduce the capacity to attend a class, while an excessively demanding training schedule may interfere with rest. These conditions belong within formulation when they contribute to difficulties or limit engagement with treatment.

Within NeuroAffective-CBT (NA-CBT), TED refers to Tirednessโ€“Exerciseโ€“Diet. Mireaโ€™s exercise discussion emphasises individualisation and meaningful participation (Mirea, 2025a), while the applied TED account places sleep, movement and nutrition within therapeutic planning (Mirea, 2025b). Practical questions include whether the person is sufficiently rested, whether the activity fits their capacity and whether training supports daily life or becomes another demand they feel compelled to meet.

Mireaโ€™s (2026) Pendulum-Effect account describes avoidance, overcompensation and capitulation as protective responses within a formulation concerned with shame. In training, these might appear as withdrawing when mistakes become visible, exercising punitively to prove worth or accepting an identity of permanent incapability. Embodied rehearsal offers a proposed way of practising a different response while difficult experience remains present.

This formulation helps distinguish occasions when demands should be reduced from occasions when a prediction maintaining avoidance could usefully be tested. Rest and adaptation may be appropriate on one occasion; on another, the useful learning may be that discomfort is compatible with chosen action.

Meichenbaumโ€™s Roadmap to Resilience places physical resources alongside interpersonal, emotional, cognitive, behavioural and spiritual resources (Meichenbaum, n.d.). This broader account keeps strengths, relationships and meaning visible alongside physical capability.

Matching movement to the individual

Activity selection begins with interests and circumstances. What has the person enjoyed previously? Would they prefer technical learning, rhythm, independent practice, cooperation or competition? What does a particular sport represent to them? Physical health, disability and previous injury matter alongside cultural identity, cost, transport and the available training environment.

The useful psychological question is often what the person needs an opportunity to practise. Achievable progression may help someone who expects failure. A supportive class may provide opportunities to be seen trying and receive feedback. Partner work might allow someone to express a preference, while regular shared activity may offer structure and repeated contact to someone experiencing isolation.

These possibilities do not prescribe a sport for a diagnosis. One person with social anxiety may appreciate interaction organised around a shared task; another may initially prefer predictable individual instruction. Someone seeking confidence may find a suitable opportunity in martial arts, dance, climbing or resistance training. Formulation clarifies what confidence means and how the setting might help develop it.

Personal meaning and enjoyment also matter for continuation. Teixeira et al. (2012) reviewed 66 studies of exercise through self-determination theory. Their findings supported relationships between autonomous motivation and participation, with enjoyment and intrinsic motivation particularly relevant to longer-term adherence. Much of the evidence was observational.

Interest may develop through skill, companionship or discovering that movement feels different from what was anticipated. Initial discomfort does not necessarily indicate a poor match, while persistent difficulty should remain open to review. Choosing another instructor, format or activity can be a successful outcome of collaborative planning.

Why martial arts may be a useful resource

Martial arts can bring technical learning, bodily effort and interpersonal negotiation into the same activity. Depending on the practice, participants must manage distance, coordinate movement, respond to another person and communicate the intensity they are willing to accept. These features can make questions of capability, control and boundaries immediately available for reflection.

Their significance remains individual. Someone who habitually withdraws may value discovering that they can take up space and act decisively. A person who overcompensates through excessive effort may benefit from practising restraint, accepting correction or stopping at an agreed point. Another may find predictable partner work an accessible route into cooperation and connection.

These are proposed learning opportunities. Their usefulness depends on preference, instruction and interpretation. The range of available formats also allows adaptation: individual non-contact practice, recreational group training and partner exercises need not involve the same demands.

The clinical rationale rests on the fit between these opportunities and the personโ€™s formulation. Martial practice becomes informative when it allows relevant responses to be practised and reviewed.

Confidence, shame and responses to mistakes

Confidence may develop through supported action. A simple movement becomes a short combination, and repetition makes progress visible. Someone expecting complete failure may discover that they can learn part of a task and return after difficulty.

Technical mastery, specific self-efficacy and global self-worth nevertheless remain distinguishable. A person can acquire skill while continuing to interpret mistakes as evidence of inadequacy. Shame and self-criticism therefore warrant attention when relevant to the formulation. Compassion-focused therapy provides one example of explicitly addressing these difficulties (Leaviss and Uttley, 2015).

Training offers frequent encounters with being inexperienced. Sequences are forgotten and coordination develops unevenly. A behavioural experiment could examine a prediction that an ordinary mistake will lead to rejection. It requires an agreed prediction, suitable practice and review of what happened, including the participantโ€™s interpretation and protective strategies.

Progression can vary through complexity, speed, effort or social visibility. These dimensions need not increase together. For someone whose worth depends on achievement, a useful task might involve receiving correction without self-attack or stopping at an agreed level.

Assertiveness can also be rehearsed through asking for clarification, requesting lighter contact or declining an additional round. The instructorโ€™s response becomes part of the learning. Physical performance provides only a partial account of progress when the intended change concerns communicating a need or recovering from a mistake.

Manageable challenge and coping rehearsal

Exertion, uncertainty and frustration can provide occasions to practise coping. The first challenge may be entering the venue; later tasks might involve an unfamiliar combination or remaining engaged after an error.

Meichenbaum and Deffenbacherโ€™s (1988) stress inoculation framework offers a useful structure: develop a shared understanding, acquire and rehearse coping skills, then apply and review them in relevant situations. This directs attention to preparation and coping choices before increasing demand.

Brief self-instructions such as โ€œslow the sequenceโ€, โ€œask for clarificationโ€ or โ€œreset and try againโ€ connect language with available actions. Hatzigeorgiadis et al. (2011) found that self-talk interventions improved sport performance. Their wider therapeutic contribution needs assessment against the intended clinical outcome.

Physical endurance, anxiety sensitivity and distress tolerance are distinct. LeBouthillier and Asmundson (2015) found that one aerobic exercise session reduced anxiety sensitivity without improving distress tolerance or intolerance of uncertainty. Their later four-week trial involving 48 participants reported benefits for distress tolerance and intolerance of uncertainty following resistance training (LeBouthillier and Asmundson, 2017). Different activities and doses may influence different processes.

Craske et al. (2014) emphasise expectancy violation and new learning within exposure rather than requiring fear to diminish during a session. Movement could provide a setting for such learning where a relevant fear has been identified. The task might examine whether activation can be experienced while retaining choice. Increased intensity alone is an inadequate measure of therapeutic progress.

Attention, flexibility and personal meaning

Movement sequences require attention to targets, balance, timing and instructions. A participant can notice distraction or self-criticism and return to the next action. This provides a concrete setting for attentional practice, with transfer beyond the task requiring review.

Acceptance and commitment therapy offers language for willingness, defusion and values-guided action. Macri and Rogge (2024) review psychological flexibility and inflexibility processes within ACT. Applied here, willingness might involve allowing embarrassment while trying a chosen task; defusion might involve noticing โ€œeveryone thinks I am uselessโ€ without treating it as an instruction to leave. Flexibility also includes adapting or declining when those choices serve the personโ€™s goals.

Dialectical behaviour therapy distinguishes mindfulness, emotion regulation, distress tolerance and interpersonal effectiveness (Chapman, 2006). These distinctions help specify whether a task concerns attending, modifying activation, enduring distress or communicating a need.

Absorption during training may provide welcome relief. Its function deserves review if movement becomes the only way to avoid painful thoughts. Psychological flexibility concerns the range of responses available, including the ability to rest and engage with difficulties elsewhere.

Meaning should likewise be elicited directly. Practice may represent cooperation, capability or community membership; it may also become organised around punishment or approval. Park (2010) distinguishes efforts to make meaning from meanings actually achieved. Attendance and enjoyment therefore provide incomplete evidence of changes in longstanding beliefs or identity.

Bodily activation, breathing and recovery

Training may make breath-holding, muscular bracing, fatigue and rising arousal more noticeable. A participant can practise adjusting effort, recognising tension and responding to changing demands.

Competition research demonstrates that these demands can be accompanied by substantial physiological activation. Slimani et al. (2018) identified increases in cortisol, adrenaline and noradrenaline following striking combat events compared with pre-combat measurements. These findings concern acute responses to competition and cannot establish how every recreational participant experiences training or whether participation produces lasting improvements in regulation.

Our observations suggest that increasing familiarity may sometimes be accompanied by less unnecessary tension, more economical movement and better-paced effort. We propose that this can provide a setting for learning to act purposefully while activated. This interpretation concerns observable responses; particular hormone or neurotransmitter levels cannot be inferred from performance.

Sometimes the useful task involves reducing unnecessary activation. At other times, it involves discovering that activation is tolerable. Instructions should fit the therapeutic purpose and physical demand.

Breathing during movement differs from a separate paced-breathing practice. Balban et al. (2023) examined brief daily structured breathing protocols, including cyclic sighing, and reported effects on mood and respiratory rate. Fincham et al. (2023) found that coherent breathing at approximately 5.5 breaths per minute did not outperform a matched 12-breaths-per-minute practice on mental health and wellbeing outcomes in 400 participants. These studies concern particular breathing protocols rather than breathing instructions during striking combinations.

During exertion, ventilation must accommodate physical demand. Recovery breathing can be explored separately and reviewed for whether it supports participation. A practice may become restrictive if the person concludes that discomfort must disappear before action is possible.

Recovery also concerns how a session ends, rest between training days and responses to fatigue. These observations help establish whether exercise supports wider functioning or becomes punitive. Recovery should remain adaptable rather than become another performance standard.

Belonging, coaching and interpersonal boundaries

A supportive club can offer repeated contact around shared activity. Connection may develop without immediate personal disclosure. Predictable routines, recognition and constructive feedback may make participation easier, depending on the interpersonal environment.

For people with histories of coercion or interpersonal threat, proximity, commands, touch or unpredictability may carry particular significance. Preparation should establish what participation involves, available adaptations and how consent can be withdrawn. An instructor who respects a request can support learning that needs may be expressed without rejection.

A first step may involve contacting an instructor, observing a class or trying a short introduction. Review should address experience and interpretation. Did the anticipated difficulty occur? Did assistance feel useful or become further evidence of inadequacy? Was there interest or enjoyment?

An unpleasant experience may justify another setting. It should not automatically be interpreted as avoidance to overcome. The suitability of the environment remains part of the formulation.

A hypothetical clinical illustration

The following illustration describes proposed professional reasoning rather than an actual patient account.

An adult interested in boxing avoids asking for help at work and expects that expressing a need will provoke irritation. They also stop unfamiliar activities after mistakes, interpreting difficulty as evidence of incompetence. Assessment explores physical health, previous learning experiences, the meaning of bodily activation and whether current relationships contain actual hostility. It identifies strengths, including an interest in technical skills and previous occasions of effective communication.

A shared hypothesis is that remaining silent provides immediate relief while preventing learning about how others respond to reasonable requests. The client chooses a short non-contact introduction with an instructor who welcomes adaptation. The proposed experiment concerns requesting a slower pace during a manageable combination.

Before practice, clinician and client specify the prediction and rehearse a credible request. Afterwards, review examines whether the request was made, how the instructor responded and how that response was interpreted. If a respectful response is dismissed as โ€œonly because this is therapyโ€, the interpretation becomes a question to investigate. A dismissive response would require reconsideration of both the prediction and the suitability of the setting.

An agreed experiment outside training might involve asking a colleague to clarify an instruction. Review would distinguish willingness, actual behaviour and confidence, which may change at different rates. The example shows how a chosen physical activity can provide a setting for testing a prediction and rehearsing agency.

Evaluating learning beyond training

Evaluation should match the formulation. Technical competence, specific self-efficacy, global self-worth, self-critical responding and everyday participation are related but distinct outcomes. Session review can record predictions, coping choices, interpretation and actual behaviour. Suitable symptom or wellbeing measures can complement personally meaningful goals.

Learning outside training requires further opportunities for practice. Someone who returns to a drill after an error might revisit an activity they previously abandoned. A participant who communicates a limit may examine where else expressing a preference matters. These are further experiments with outcomes to review.

Follow-up should examine whether changes persist, whether participation continues and what happens during interruptions. Attendance, adaptations, adverse experiences and discontinuation provide information about fit. Missed sessions and fluctuating energy should be anticipated within a realistic routine.

The clientโ€™s explanation should remain distinguishable from the clinicianโ€™s inference. Reported improvement is valuable information, while causal conclusions require stronger evidence.

Physical risk and professional responsibilities

Contact combat sports introduce injury exposures requiring explicit consideration. Head impacts and concussion are material concerns; the Association of Ringside Physicians has emphasised the particular demands of concussion management in this setting (Neidecker et al., 2019).

Non-contact practice can provide movement and learning opportunities without making head contact part of the therapeutic task, but it is not injury-free. Grappling, kicking and pad work place demands on joints, balance and physical capacity.

Selection and progression should account for health, previous injury and current capacity, with appropriate professional input where needed. Participation should permit stopping and distinguish ordinary effort from pain or symptoms requiring reassessment.

Psychotherapy and martial arts instruction require separate competencies. A clinician using physical tasks needs relevant competence and suitable arrangements, or collaboration with a qualified instructor. Clear roles, informed consent, confidentiality and agreed communication help participants understand what is offered.

Combining roles requires attention to whether the person feels free to disagree or stop. Information shared with an instructor should be limited to what is needed for agreed coordination and shared with the clientโ€™s consent.

Limitations and research priorities

This selective review combines heterogeneous exercise findings, discipline-specific research and conceptual accounts. Its source selection may omit relevant evidence, and it provides no pooled estimate or formal appraisal of the literature as a whole. Observations and individual experiences inform the clinical proposal but do not establish treatment effectiveness.

Smith and Merwin (2021) describe interacting biological and behavioural pathways through which exercise may influence mental health. General findings concerning cognition, inflammation or neuroplasticity cannot establish that a particular martial arts programme produces the same changes or that those changes explain clinical improvement.

A useful comparative question is whether explicit formulation-guided instruction adds benefit to otherwise similar physical practice. Research could compare matched programmes with and without agreed psychological tasks, accounting for encouragement, contact time, progression and expectations. Comparisons with other meaningful activities could examine shared contributions such as mastery and social connection.

Individualisation also deserves study. Does matching preferences and therapeutic goals improve engagement? Which features of instruction influence participation? When should the initial choice be revised?

Prospective assessment should measure intended outcomes and candidate processes over time. Changes in proposed mechanisms should precede the outcomes they are intended to explain, with alternative explanations considered.

Carefully planned single-case experimental designs may help investigate delivery before larger trials. Follow-up, concurrent care, practitioner competence and less favourable experiences should be reported. Including people who discontinue or find the activity unsuitable would improve understanding of practical limits.

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests that martial arts training can support mental health for some participants, although benefits vary across practices, populations and training environments. Its place within individualised care depends on what participation offers the particular person.

Martial arts bring physical activity, technical learning and interpersonal exchange together, creating opportunities to practise choice during manageable challenge. Therapeutic goals may concern developing confidence, responding differently to mistakes, communicating limits, coping with activation or reconnecting with others. Clinical usefulness depends on matching these opportunities to the personโ€™s formulation and reviewing what becomes available beyond training.

The wider exercise literature supports therapeutic relevance, while the specific outcomes and mechanisms of martial arts require further investigation. Our observations inform a clinical proposal: chosen and appropriately adapted practice may provide a setting in which people test expectations, develop agency and participate more fully in a life they value.

References

Balban, M.Y., Neri, E., Kogon, M.M., Weed, L., Nouriani, B., Jo, B., Holl, G., Zeitzer, J.M., Spiegel, D. and Huberman, A.D. (2023) โ€˜Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousalโ€™, Cell Reports Medicine, 4(1), article 100895. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895.

Bozdarov, J., Jones, B.D.M., Daskalakis, Z.J. and Husain, M.I. (2023) โ€˜Boxing as an intervention in mental health: a scoping reviewโ€™, American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 17(4), pp. 589โ€“600. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276221124095.

Bruce Lee Enterprises (2017) โ€˜#78 Motivation when youโ€™re stuckโ€™, Bruce Lee Podcast, 27 December. Available at: https://brucelee.com/podcast-blog/2017/12/27/78-motivation-when-youre-stuck (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Bruce Lee Enterprises (n.d.) โ€˜The philosophiesโ€™. Available at: https://brucelee.com/philosophies/ (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Chapman, A.L. (2006) โ€˜Dialectical behavior therapy: current indications and unique elementsโ€™, Psychiatry (Edgmont), 3(9), pp. 62โ€“68. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20975829/.

Ciaccioni, S., Castro, O., Bahrami, F., Tomporowski, P.D., Capranica, L., Biddle, S.J.H., Vergeer, I. and Pesce, C. (2024) โ€˜Martial arts, combat sports, and mental health in adults: a systematic reviewโ€™, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 70, article 102556. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102556.

Craske, M.G., Treanor, M., Conway, C.C., Zbozinek, T. and Vervliet, B. (2014) โ€˜Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approachโ€™, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, pp. 10โ€“23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006.

Fincham, G.W., Strauss, C. and Cavanagh, K. (2023) โ€˜Effect of coherent breathing on mental health and wellbeing: a randomised placebo-controlled trialโ€™, Scientific Reports, 13, article 22141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49279-8.

Foundation of the Hellenic World (n.d.) โ€˜Introduction of the events to the Olympic Games programโ€™. Available at: https://www.ime.gr/olympics/ancient/en/203b1.html (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Fuller, J.R. (1988) โ€˜Martial arts and psychological healthโ€™, British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61(4), pp. 317โ€“328. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02794.x.

Gordon, B.R., McDowell, C.P., Hallgren, M., Meyer, J.D., Lyons, M. and Herring, M.P. (2018) โ€˜Association of efficacy of resistance exercise training with depressive symptoms: meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trialsโ€™, JAMA Psychiatry, 75(6), pp. 566โ€“576. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0572.

Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Zourbanos, N., Galanis, E. and Theodorakis, Y. (2011) โ€˜Self-talk and sports performance: a meta-analysisโ€™, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(4), pp. 348โ€“356. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611413136.

Leaviss, J. and Uttley, L. (2015) โ€˜Psychotherapeutic benefits of compassion-focused therapy: an early systematic reviewโ€™, Psychological Medicine, 45(5), pp. 927โ€“945. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002141.

LeBouthillier, D.M. and Asmundson, G.J.G. (2015) โ€˜A single bout of aerobic exercise reduces anxiety sensitivity but not intolerance of uncertainty or distress tolerance: a randomized controlled trialโ€™, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(4), pp. 252โ€“263. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2015.1028094.

LeBouthillier, D.M. and Asmundson, G.J.G. (2017) โ€˜The efficacy of aerobic exercise and resistance training as transdiagnostic interventions for anxiety-related disorders and constructs: a randomized controlled trialโ€™, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 52, pp. 43โ€“52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.09.005.

Macri, J.A. and Rogge, R.D. (2024) โ€˜Examining domains of psychological flexibility and inflexibility as treatment mechanisms in acceptance and commitment therapy: a comprehensive systematic and meta-analytic reviewโ€™, Clinical Psychology Review, 110, article 102432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102432.

Mai, S. (2015) โ€˜Kiaiโ€™, translated by S. Pranin, Aikido Journal, 6 January. Available at: https://aikidojournal.com/2015/01/06/kiai-by-sakura-mai/ (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Meichenbaum, D. (n.d.) Roadmap to Resilience. Available at: https://roadmaptoresilience.wordpress.com/ (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Meichenbaum, D.H. and Deffenbacher, J.L. (1988) โ€˜Stress inoculation trainingโ€™, The Counseling Psychologist, 16(1), pp. 69โ€“90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000088161005.

Mirea, D. (2025a) โ€˜Physical exercise, sports science and mental healthโ€™, The NeuroAffective-CBT Journal, TED Series, 31 October. Available at: https://neuroaffectivecbt.com/2025/10/31/ted-series-part-vii-physical-exercise-sports-science-and-mental-health/ (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Mirea, D. (2025b) โ€˜TED in NeuroAffective-CBT: An applied self-regulation framework for enhancing emotional well-being through sleep, movement, and nutritionโ€™. Available at: https://neuroaffectivecbt.com/2025/12/10/ted-in-neuroaffective-cbt-an-applied-self-regulation-framework-for-enhancing-emotional-well-being-through-sleep-movement-and-nutrition/ (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Mirea, D. (2026) โ€˜Beyond fake it till you make it: The Pendulum-Effect, embodied rehearsal and the development of the Integrated-Selfโ€™. Available at: https://neuroaffectivecbt.com/2026/09/03/beyond-fake-it-till-you-make-it-the-pendulum-effect-embodied-rehearsal-and-the-development-of-the-integrated-self/ (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Moore, B., Dudley, D. and Woodcock, S. (2020) โ€˜The effect of martial arts training on mental health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysisโ€™, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 24(4), pp. 402โ€“412. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.017.

National Qigong Association (2025) โ€˜The 3 Dantian: An in-depth lookโ€™, 20 January. Available at: https://www.nqa.org/library/the-3-dantian-an-in-depth-look (Accessed: 23 October 2026).

Neidecker, J., Sethi, N.K., Taylor, R. et al. (2019) โ€˜Concussion management in combat sports: consensus statement from the Association of Ringside Physiciansโ€™, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(6), pp. 328โ€“333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098799.

Noetel, M., Sanders, T., Gallardo-Gรณmez, D., Taylor, P., Del Pozo Cruz, B., van den Hoek, D., Smith, J.J., Mahoney, J., Spathis, J., Moresi, M., Pagano, R., Pagano, L., Vasconcellos, R., Arnott, H., Varley, B., Parker, P., Biddle, S. and Lonsdale, C. (2024) โ€˜Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsโ€™, BMJ, 384, article e075847. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075847.

Park, C.L. (2010) โ€˜Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life eventsโ€™, Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), pp. 257โ€“301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301.

Salkovskis, P.M., Sighvatsson, M.B. and Sigurdsson, J.F. (2023) โ€˜How effective psychological treatments work: mechanisms of change in cognitive behavioural therapy and beyondโ€™, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 51(6), pp. 595โ€“615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465823000590.

Shahar, M. (2008) The Shaolin Monastery: History, Religion, and the Chinese Martial Arts. Honolulu: University of Hawaiโ€˜i Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824865023.

Singh, B., Olds, T., Curtis, R., Dumuid, D., Virgara, R., Watson, A., Szeto, K., Oโ€™Connor, E., Ferguson, T., Eglitis, E., Miatke, A., Simpson, C.E. and Maher, C. (2023) โ€˜Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for improving depression, anxiety and distress: an overview of systematic reviewsโ€™, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(18), pp. 1203โ€“1209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-106195.

Slimani, M., Paravlic, A.H., Chaabene, H., Davis, P., Chamari, K. and Cheour, F. (2018) โ€˜Hormonal responses to striking combat sports competition: a systematic review and meta-analysisโ€™, Biology of Sport, 35(2), pp. 121โ€“136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.71601.

Smith, P.J. and Merwin, R.M. (2021) โ€˜The role of exercise in management of mental health disorders: an integrative reviewโ€™, Annual Review of Medicine, 72, pp. 45โ€“62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-060619-022943.

Teixeira, P.J., Carraรงa, E.V., Markland, D., Silva, M.N. and Ryan, R.M. (2012) โ€˜Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic reviewโ€™, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, article 78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.

Twemlow, S.W. and Sacco, F.C. (1998) โ€˜The application of traditional martial arts practice and theory to the treatment of violent adolescentsโ€™, Adolescence, 33(131), pp. 505โ€“518. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9831868/.

Weiss, E.R., Hart-Derrick, V.R., Ramsay-Patel, T., Barnes, S.E., Anderson, H., Gatti, C. and Davis, M.T. (2025) โ€˜Acceptability and feasibility of a Taekwondo mindful movement intervention in dialectical behavior therapyโ€™, Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 35(2), article 100527. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbct.2025.100527.

White, R.L., Vella, S., Biddle, S., Sutcliffe, J., Guagliano, J.M., Uddin, R., Burgin, A., Apostolopoulos, M., Nguyen, T., Young, C., Taylor, N., Lilley, S. and Teychenne, M. (2024) โ€˜Physical activity and mental health: a systematic review and best-evidence synthesis of mediation and moderation studiesโ€™, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21(1), article 134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01676-6.

About the Authors

Daniel Mirea is the founder of NeuroAffective-CBT, an accredited CBT therapist and a university lecturer. He is also a trained martial artist and a sports-psychotherapy consultant.

Chris People holds a black belt in traditional Japanese martial arts and teaching awards in combat sports and Brazilian martial arts. He trains both adults and children and is an accredited Hypno-CBT therapist and trainer. He is also undertaking training in psychotherapy.

Declaration of Interests and Article Scope

Daniel Mirea founded NeuroAffective-CBT, which provides a conceptual perspective discussed in this article. The clinical proposals draw partly on the authorsโ€™ observations and personal experiences of training. No original patient data are reported, and the clinical illustration is hypothetical.

Beyond the Mirror: A NeuroAffective-CBT Case Study of Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Dr Oana Barnett (July, 2026)
|ย The NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ Journal |ย 

Abstract

Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is a debilitating psychological condition characterised by persistent preoccupation with perceived defects in physical appearance, often resulting in significant emotional distress, functional impairment, and repetitive safety behaviours. Although cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) remains the recommended psychological intervention for BDD, many individuals continue to experience recurrent symptoms despite previous therapeutic gains.

This case study introduces NeuroAffective-CBT (NA-CBT) through the treatment of “Sophie”, a woman in her fifties presenting with longstanding Body Dysmorphic Disorder, chronic shame, recurrent depression, insomnia, social withdrawal, and increasing psychological distress following menopause, occupational loss, and repeated cosmetic procedures. Rather than conceptualising these difficulties as isolated symptoms, NA-CBT formulated them as interacting manifestations of increased neuroaffective load, arising through the dynamic relationship between physiology, affect, cognition, autobiographical memory, and interpersonal experience.

Grounded within the cognitive behavioural tradition, NA-CBT integrates contemporary neuroscience, affective science, lifestyle medicine, and behavioural psychology while maintaining the collaborative, structured and evidence-informed principles that characterise CBT (Beck, 1976, 2021; Clark & Beck, 2010). Central to this formulation is the TED (Tiredโ€“Exerciseโ€“Diet) framework, alongside the Bodyโ€“Brainโ€“Affect Triangle, which together provide a practical model for understanding how physiological regulation influences affective processing, cognitive interpretation, and psychological flexibility (Mirea, 2023, 2025a, 2025b).

Treatment focused on reducing neuroaffective load, strengthening physiological regulation, facilitating NeuroAffective Narrative Reconsolidation, and supporting the gradual emergence of a more coherent and compassionate Integrated-Self. Throughout therapy, the therapist repeatedly returned to a simple but clinically significant question:

“What might be maintaining your neuroaffective load, and what might help reduce it?”

Rather than replacing established cognitive behavioural models of Body Dysmorphic Disorder, NA-CBT extends them by integrating affective neuroscience and physiological regulation into psychological formulation and intervention. This case study illustrates how an integrated neuroaffective perspective may enhance therapeutic understanding and contribute to the treatment of complex presentations characterised by chronic shame, self-criticism, and recurrent emotional distress.

Keywords: Body Dysmorphic Disorder; Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; NeuroAffective-CBT; Affect; Neuroscience; TED; Lifestyle Interventions; Integrated-Self.

Introduction

Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is characterised by persistent preoccupation with perceived defects in physical appearance that are either unobservable or appear slight to others (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). These concerns are typically accompanied by repetitive behaviours such as mirror checking, camouflage, reassurance seeking, appearance comparisons, and avoidance of social situations. The condition frequently results in profound impairment across occupational, interpersonal, and emotional domains and is associated with elevated rates of depression, anxiety, social isolation, and suicidality (Phillips, 2005; Phillips et al., 2010).

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) remains the recommended psychological treatment for Body Dysmorphic Disorder, with substantial evidence supporting interventions targeting dysfunctional appearance beliefs, selective attention, avoidance, and safety behaviours (Veale, 2004; Veale & Neziroglu, 2010; Wilhelm et al., 2013). Nevertheless, many individuals continue to experience recurring symptoms following successful therapy, particularly when significant life transitions, physiological changes, or cumulative adversity increase emotional vulnerability.

These observations invite an important clinical question: Is recurrence always evidence that previous therapy has failed? Or might it reflect a profound change in the physiological and affective conditions within which previously acquired psychological skills are now expected to operate?

NeuroAffective-CBT (NA-CBT) emerged from this question. NA-CBT belongs firmly within the broad family of cognitive behavioural therapies. It retains the structured formulation, collaborative empiricism, behavioural experimentation, and evidence-informed practice that have long characterised CBT (Beck, 1976; Beck, 2021; Clark & Beck, 2010). What distinguishes NA-CBT is not a departure from cognitive behavioural principles, but a greater depth of integration. It draws together contemporary neuroscience, affective science, physiology, attachment, and behavioural psychology within a unified cognitive behavioural formulation (Damasio, 1999; LeDoux, 2015; Panksepp, 1998; Mirea, 2018).

Here, philosophy meets science. The body meets the mind.

Rather than conceptualising emotional distress as existing solely within cognition, NA-CBT understands psychological experience as emerging through continuous interactions between physiology, affective systems, cognitive interpretation, autobiographical memory, and interpersonal relationships. Mind and body are therefore not treated as separate domains requiring different explanatory models, but as components of a single, dynamically regulated neuroaffective system (Barrett, 2017; Friston, 2010; Siegel, 2012).

This perspective does not replace existing CBT models of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. Instead, it extends them by asking an additional question:

What neuroaffective conditions allow these cognitive and behavioural processes to become more or less dominant?

The following case study illustrates how this formulation informed the treatment of a woman with longstanding Body Dysmorphic Disorder whose psychological difficulties unfolded against a backdrop of increasing physiological, relational, and emotional burden.

Case Presentation

Sophie was a woman in her early fifties who self-referred for psychological therapy following a significant deterioration in her emotional wellbeing. She had previously completed a course of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy several years earlier, during which she developed a good understanding of the cognitive and behavioural processes maintaining her appearance concerns. She described this therapy positively and reported that it had enabled her to manage her symptoms effectively for a number of years.

However, by the time she returned to therapy, Sophie no longer felt able to access the psychological flexibility she had previously achieved.

Over the intervening years, she had undergone several cosmetic procedures in the hope of correcting perceived flaws in her appearance. Rather than reducing her distress, these interventions intensified her preoccupation, leaving her feeling increasingly disfigured and emotionally devastated. She subsequently became involved in prolonged legal proceedings against one of the practitioners, describing the experience as deeply invalidating and reinforcing her conviction that she had been permanently damaged.

Alongside these experiences, Sophie’s life had changed considerably. She was now navigating menopause, persistent insomnia, increasing fatigue, and declining physical energy. She had lost her employment and found it difficult to secure another position. The increasing reliance on online meetings following the COVID-19 pandemic intensified her appearance concerns, as seeing herself on camera throughout the working day became a persistent source of anxiety and self-monitoring. She frequently turned her camera off whenever possible and described feeling acutely self-conscious whenever she was visible on screen.

Socially, Sophie reported becoming increasingly isolated. Although married, she experienced growing emotional distance within her relationship and described feeling profoundly alone. Her family of origin remained abroad, limiting opportunities for support. She also spoke with increasing sadness about never having had children, describing this as a source of grief that had become more salient as she grew older.

Despite continuing to use many of the cognitive strategies she had learned previously, Sophie experienced overwhelming shame, chronic self-criticism, increasing avoidance, disrupted sleep, emotional exhaustion, and persistent beliefs that she was fundamentally defective. She no longer described herself as simply feeling unattractive.She described feeling broken.

From a conventional CBT perspective, these changes might reasonably be understood as an exacerbation of existing Body Dysmorphic Disorder following multiple adverse life events. From a NeuroAffective-CBT perspective, however, a different question emerged:

What had changed within Sophie’s neuroaffective system that made previously effective psychological strategies increasingly difficult to access?

Developmental Experiences and the Emergence of the Integrated-Self

Sophie’s appearance concerns did not emerge in isolation. As therapy progressed, it became increasingly apparent that her relationship with beauty, worth, and belonging had developed within a family environment in which physical appearance carried considerable emotional significance.

She described growing up with the implicit understanding that beauty was more than an aesthetic qualityโ€”it reflected character, value, and lovability. Family conversations frequently centred on appearance, and those considered physically attractive appeared to receive greater admiration, attention, and warmth. Beauty became quietly associated with being “a good person”, while ordinary appearance felt synonymous with being overlooked.

One figure came to symbolise this experience throughout Sophie’s childhood.

Her cousin was widely regarded within the family as exceptionally beautiful. Sophie recalled adults openly commenting on her cousin’s appearance with admiration and delight, describing her as special, elegant, and somehow different from everyone else. As a young girl, Sophie became convinced that if she could somehow become beautiful enough, she too might receive the same affection, recognition, and emotional closeness from her mother and older sister.

Although this belief was never explicitly stated, it gradually became woven into her understanding of herself and others.

Beauty became associated with safety.Acceptance became conditional. Worth became something that had to be earned.

From a NeuroAffective-CBT perspective, these experiences contributed to the development of Deeply Rooted Beliefs (DRBs) concerning identity, acceptance, and interpersonal value. Unlike automatic thoughts, DRBs are understood as emotionally organised assumptions that develop over repeated affective experiences and gradually shape how individuals interpret themselves, others, and the world (Beck, 1976; Mirea, 2018). These beliefs rarely operate at the level of deliberate reasoning. Instead, they become embedded within autobiographical memory, affective prediction, and patterns of physiological responding.

One childhood memory remained particularly vivid throughout therapy.

Sophie recalled accompanying her cousin into a shop during adolescence. Her cousin secretly stole an item before leaving the store. Moments later, the shop assistant stopped Sophie, accusing her of the theft. Despite Sophie’s repeated insistence that she had done nothing wrong, the accusation continued. What remained most emotionally significant was not the theft itself, but the explanation she believed lay behind the accusation.

She recalled the shop assistant commenting that her cousin “looked too beautiful” to have stolen anything, whereas Sophie, with her darker features, “looked like the sort of person who would.” Whether these words were remembered verbatim or reconstructed over time became less important than the emotional meaning they continued to hold.

For Sophie, the experience crystallised a painful conclusion:

“People see something bad in me before they know me.”

The memory became one of the earliest examples of shame becoming organised not around behaviour, but around identity.

Many years later, this image continued to intrude unexpectedly. It frequently emerged before social situations, during work meetings, while shopping, and whenever Sophie felt herself being observed. Although intellectually she recognised the event belonged to the past, emotionally it continued to feel immediate. Her body responded as though the judgement were happening again in the present.

From a NeuroAffective-CBT perspective, such memories are understood not simply as autobiographical recollections but as emotionally encoded experiences that continue to influence present-day prediction and affective regulation (Lane et al., 2015; Brewin, 2014). Rather than remaining historical events, they become living templates through which new interpersonal experiences are interpreted.

Importantly, therapy did not conceptualise these experiences as evidence of a permanently fragmented self.

Instead, NA-CBT assumes that beneath layers of shame, fear, self-protection, and defensive adaptation lies an Integrated-Self, a coherent and compassionate sense of identity that has become increasingly difficult to access under conditions of sustained neuroaffective load (Mirea, 2018).

The therapeutic task therefore shifts. Rather than asking how the fragmented self can be repaired, NA-CBT asks:

What conditions might allow the Integrated Self to emerge more consistently?

This subtle change in formulation proved clinically important. It invited both therapist and client to become curious about the conditions supporting psychological integration, rather than focusing exclusively on pathology or symptom reduction.

Pause for Curiosity

Perhaps the most important question was no longer:

“Why does Sophie continue to experience Body Dysmorphic Disorder?”

Instead, therapy repeatedly returned to a different question:

“What might be maintaining Sophie’s neuroaffective load, and what might help reduce it?”

This question became a recurring anchor throughout therapy.

Rather than assuming that distress reflected psychological weakness or therapeutic failure, it invited curiosity about the interaction between physiology, affect, cognition, memory, relationships, and the broader context in which emotional regulation was taking place.

Within NeuroAffective-CBT, curiosity is not simply a therapeutic attitude.

It is a clinical intervention.

Neuroaffective Formulation

The developmental formulation helped explain why Sophie’s appearance concerns had become so emotionally significant. The next therapeutic question was equally important:

Why had these difficulties intensified now, after several years of relative stability?

Although Sophie retained many of the cognitive insights she had developed during her previous course of CBT, she increasingly described feeling unable to access them during periods of emotional distress. She understood that her thoughts were often biased, recognised many of her appearance-related safety behaviours, and could frequently identify alternative interpretations. Yet these skills no longer seemed sufficient to regulate the intensity of her emotional experience.

Rather than viewing this as evidence that therapy had failed, NA-CBT approached it as evidence that the neuroaffective conditions within which these cognitive skills operated had fundamentally changed.

Over recent years Sophie had experienced the cumulative impact of persistent insomnia, menopausal transition, occupational loss, increasing social isolation, repeated cosmetic procedures, prolonged legal proceedings, reduced physical activity, and the gradual erosion of interpersonal support. Each experience contributed not simply to “stress,” but to an increasing burden on the systems responsible for physiological regulation, emotional processing, and cognitive flexibility.

Within NeuroAffective-CBT, this accumulation is conceptualised as neuroaffective load (Mirea, 2018).

Neuroaffective load refers to the cumulative demands placed upon the integrated body-brain system through ongoing physiological dysregulation, affective activation, interpersonal adversity, cognitive burden, and environmental pressures. Unlike the broader concept of stress, neuroaffective load emphasises the dynamic interaction between bodily regulation and psychological functioning. It recognises that emotional suffering often emerges not from a single precipitating event but from the gradual accumulation of multiple interacting influences that reduce the nervous system’s capacity for flexible adaptation.

This distinction proved clinically meaningful.

When Sophie was invited to consider her difficulties through the lens of neuroaffective load, her experience began to make sense in a different way. Rather than concluding that she had “gone backwards” or that she had somehow lost the benefits of her previous therapy, she became increasingly able to understand why familiar psychological strategies were becoming harder to access.

Her brain had not forgotten what she had learned. It was working under very different physiological and affective conditions. This understanding became one of the most compassionate moments within therapy. Rather than asking,

“Why can’t I cope anymore?”

Sophie gradually found herself asking,

“What has happened to my system that makes coping so much harder?”

The question itself represented an important therapeutic shift.

Pause for Curiosity

Perhaps psychological resilience is not simply a characteristic that people possess.

Perhaps it is an emergent property of a nervous system that has sufficient physiological and emotional capacity to remain flexible.

If so, therapy may need to become curious not only about thoughts and behaviours, but about the conditions that either increase or reduce neuroaffective load.

This broader perspective also complements established cognitive behavioural models of Body Dysmorphic Disorder, which emphasise dysfunctional appearance beliefs, selective attention, mirror checking, reassurance seeking, avoidance, and safety behaviours in maintaining distress (Veale, 2004; Veale & Neziroglu, 2010; Phillips, 2005; Wilhelm et al., 2013). Rather than replacing these well-established formulations, NA-CBT seeks to extend them by incorporating physiological regulation, affective neuroscience, and predictive brain processes as interacting influences on these cognitive and behavioural maintenance cycles.

In doing so, the formulation broadens the therapeutic focus. The question is no longer solely,

“What thoughts maintain the problem?” but also,

“What neuroaffective conditions make these thoughts feel so compelling?”

Mind, Body, and the Foundations of Change

Many people enter psychotherapy believing that their emotional difficulties exist primarily “in the mind.” From a NeuroAffective-CBT perspective, this understanding is incomplete.

Mind and body form a single regulatory system. Thoughts influence physiology. Physiology influences affect. Affect shapes interpretation. Interpretation influences subsequent physiological responding.

Each component continuously influences the others within an ongoing cycle of prediction and regulation (Barrett, 2017; Damasio, 1999; Friston, 2010).

For this reason, NA-CBT integrates TED (Tiredโ€“Exerciseโ€“Diet) as a core stabilisation framework within psychotherapy (Mirea, 2023, 2025a, 2025b).

TED is not presented as a lifestyle programme or a substitute for psychological therapy. Nor does the NA-CBT therapist assume the role of a dietitian, physician, physiotherapist, or exercise professional. Instead, TED provides a psychologically informed framework through which clinicians explore how sleep, movement, nutrition, energy regulation, and everyday physiological functioning influence emotional experience and psychological flexibility. Where appropriate, clients are supported to access other healthcare professionals with specialist expertise in these areas.

This distinction is important. NeuroAffective-CBT is not practising medicine, nor is it reducing psychotherapy to lifestyle advice. Rather, it recognises that psychotherapy takes place within a living nervous system. Understanding how physiological regulation interacts with emotional processing enables the therapist to formulate distress more comprehensively and to collaborate with clients in reducing factors that unnecessarily increase neuroaffective load.

For Sophie, this became an essential component of therapy. Rather than viewing chronic fatigue, menopausal changes, insomnia, reduced physical activity, and nutritional habits as separate concerns to be addressed elsewhere, they became integrated into the psychological formulation. Together they provided important clues regarding the conditions under which shame intensified, emotional flexibility diminished, and appearance concerns became increasingly dominant.

Consequently, therapy frequently returned to one practical question:

What might be maintaining your neuroaffective load, and what might help reduce it?

This question gradually became the organising principle of treatment.

Rather than functioning as a checklist, it encouraged collaborative curiosity. It also translated naturally into collaborative goal setting. Together, therapist and Sophie began distinguishing between behaviours that appeared to maintain neuroaffective load and those that helped reduce neuroaffective load.

Visually, this was represented using two interconnected formulations.

The first resembled the familiar CBT vicious cycle, illustrating how poor sleep, inactivity, shame, social withdrawal, mirror checking, self-criticism, and avoidance interacted to perpetuate neuroaffective load.

Alongside this, therapist and client gradually constructed what Sophie came to call her virtuous flower. Each petal represented a small but meaningful influence that helped restore regulation: improved sleep routines, gentle movement, stretching, regular meals, meaningful social connection, compassionate self-reflection, behavioural experiments, and valued activity. No single intervention transformed her wellbeing. Collectively, however, they gradually altered the physiological and emotional context within which change became possible.

This visual distinction proved particularly helpful because it extended familiar CBT formulation without replacing it. Sophie immediately recognised its structure while simultaneously appreciating that the therapeutic focus had broadened beyond cognition alone.

The Bodyโ€“Brainโ€“Affect Triangle

Central to NeuroAffective-CBT is the Bodyโ€“Brainโ€“Affect Triangle, a formulation that conceptualises psychological functioning as a continuously interacting regulatory system rather than a sequence of isolated psychological events. Drawing upon affective neuroscience, predictive processing, and embodied cognition, the triangle proposes that physiological regulation, predictive brain processes, and primary affective systems are engaged in a constant reciprocal dialogue (Panksepp, 1998; Damasio, 1999; Friston, 2010; Barrett, 2017; LeDoux, 2015).

Within this model, none of the three components operates independently. A change within one corner of the triangle inevitably influences the others, often before conscious awareness emerges.

Body (Physiology)

The body provides the biological context within which psychological experience unfolds. Sleep, movement, nutrition, hormonal functioning, autonomic regulation, metabolic stability, chronic pain, illness, and fatigue all influence the nervous system’s capacity to regulate emotional experience.

From this perspective, physiology is not simply a background variable. It is an active participant in emotional life.

When physiological regulation becomes compromised through chronic sleep disruption, hormonal transition, nutritional imbalance, prolonged inactivity, or persistent stress, the nervous system becomes increasingly sensitive to perceived threat. Emotional reactions occur more readily, remain active for longer, and become progressively more difficult to regulate.

Brain (Prediction and Interpretation)

Within NeuroAffective-CBT, the brain is understood primarily as a predictive organ whose central evolutionary function is protection rather than objective perception (Friston, 2010; Barrett, 2017).

Long before conscious reasoning begins, the brain is continuously asking:

“Am I safe?”

“What is about to happen?”

“What should I prepare for?”

“How bad could this become?”

These predictions are shaped not only by conscious beliefs and interpretations but also by bodily sensations, previous emotional learning, autobiographical memory, attachment experiences, and current physiological state.

Consequently, individuals rarely respond to the world exactly as it is.

They respond to the brain’s best prediction of what is about to happen.

When physiology becomes dysregulated, these predictive systems become increasingly threat-sensitive. Neutral situations are more easily interpreted as dangerous. Ambiguous facial expressions appear rejecting. Minor imperfections become overwhelming evidence of failure. Shame becomes more readily activated and more difficult to regulate.

Affect (Primary Emotional Systems)

Affect represents the fast, evolutionarily conserved emotional systems that organise survival long before reflective thinking becomes possible (Panksepp, 1998; LeDoux, 2015).

Fear. Shame. Disgust. Anger. Relief.

These emotional systems rapidly orient attention towards information relevant to survival and social belonging. Only afterwards does cognition begin constructing explanations for what has already been felt.

Within NeuroAffective-CBT, cognition therefore remains critically important, but it is understood as the meaning-making layer built upon ongoing physiological and affective activity. Emotions are not simply generated by thoughts, nor are thoughts merely reactions to emotions. Each continuously shapes the other within an integrated regulatory system.

Differentiating Affect from Interpretation

One of the central therapeutic aims of NeuroAffective-CBT is helping clients distinguish between raw affect and interpretation.

Raw affect refers to the body’s immediate emotional signalโ€”fear, shame, sadness, anger, or reliefโ€”generated rapidly in response to internal or external cues.

Interpretation refers to the meaning subsequently assigned to those emotional signals through prediction, memory, beliefs, and conscious reflection (Barrett, 2017; Damasio, 1999).

When affect and interpretation become fused, emotional experiences begin to feel absolute.

“I feel ashamed” gradually becomes “I am shameful.”

“I feel afraid” becomes “I am unsafe.”

“I feel unattractive” becomes “I am fundamentally defective.”

Helping Sophie recognise this distinction became transformative. She gradually learned that the intensity of her emotional experience did not necessarily provide accurate information about objective reality. Instead, emotions increasingly became understood as important signals requiring curiosity rather than unquestioning acceptance.

Therapy repeatedly slowed these moments by returning to a more fundamental question:

What is your body signalling right now?

followed by..

Is your brain interpreting that signal in a way that accurately reflects the present?

These questions gradually interrupted the automatic fusion of affect and identity that had characterised Sophie’s experience for many years.

Therapeutic Process

The therapeutic process unfolded over approximately twelve months through weekly outpatient sessions. Although therapy retained the collaborative structure characteristic of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, the emphasis gradually shifted from challenging isolated cognitions towards understanding the broader neuroaffective conditions within which those cognitions emerged.

From the outset, formulation became a collaborative process of curiosity rather than explanation. Rather than seeking a single underlying cause for Sophie’s distress, therapy explored how developmental experiences, current relationships, physiological regulation, affective responses, autobiographical memory, and behavioural patterns interacted to maintain her psychological difficulties.

Sophie’s previous CBT had equipped her with valuable cognitive skills. These were not discarded or replaced. Instead, they were revisited within a broader formulation that recognised why accessing these skills had become increasingly difficult under conditions of elevated neuroaffective load.

Behavioural experiments therefore remained central to therapy, but their purpose subtly expanded.

Rather than asking only, “What evidence supports this belief?” therapy increasingly asked,

“What happens to your emotional experience when your nervous system is more regulated?”

And “How does reducing neuroaffective load influence your ability to think differently?”

This shift was particularly evident when addressing mirror checking, avoidance, and appearance-focused behaviours.

Previously, behavioural experiments had focused primarily on testing catastrophic beliefs concerning Sophie’s appearance.

Within NA-CBT, these experiments continued, but they were carefully timed to coincide with periods of improved physiological regulation whenever possible. Sessions frequently explored the relationship between sleep quality, physical activity, emotional intensity, and the outcomes of behavioural experiments.

Over time, Sophie herself began noticing an important pattern. On days following adequate sleep, regular movement, and greater physiological stability, behavioural experiments felt challenging but manageable. Following several nights of poor sleep or heightened emotional exhaustion, identical experiments often felt overwhelming. This observation reinforced one of the central propositions of NA-CBT:

Psychological flexibility is not determined solely by cognitive skill. It is profoundly influenced by the physiological and affective conditions within which those skills are required.

Pause for Curiosity

Perhaps therapy becomes most effective not when clients think differently first…

…but when the conditions exist that allow different thinking to become possible.

NeuroAffective Narrative Reconsolidation (NNR)

As Sophie’s neuroaffective load gradually reduced, a notable shift began to emerge within therapy. She did not simply experience fewer distressing thoughts or engage in fewer appearance-related safety behaviours. Rather, she began relating to herself differently.

This change was subtle at first. Memories that had previously felt emotionally overwhelming became easier to approach. Shame remained present but no longer felt all-encompassing. Situations that once automatically confirmed long-held beliefs of defectiveness began to acquire alternative meanings.

Importantly, these changes did not arise through repeated attempts to replace “irrational thoughts” with more rational alternatives alone. Instead, they appeared to emerge as Sophie’s nervous system became increasingly able to tolerate emotional experience without immediately defaulting to threat-based prediction.

One memory proved particularly significant.

Throughout therapy, Sophie repeatedly returned to the childhood incident in which she had been accused of stealing after her cousin concealed an item in a shop. For many years she had experienced this memory not simply as an unfortunate childhood event but as compelling evidence that other people instinctively saw her as fundamentally bad, suspicious, or unworthy.

Earlier in life she had attempted to challenge this conclusion intellectually. She understood that the accusation had been unfair and recognised that many people would interpret the situation differently.

Yet this cognitive understanding had done little to alter the emotional meaning carried by the memory. Within NA-CBT, the therapeutic task therefore became different.

Rather than attempting to dispute the factual accuracy of the event, therapy sought to understand how its emotional significance had become organised within Sophie’s broader neuroaffective system.

The memory was no longer viewed in isolation. It became connected to a much wider developmental narrative. Repeated experiences in which beauty appeared to determine acceptance. The gradual belief that being attractive was necessary to deserve love. The experience of becoming increasingly invisible within important relationships. The emotional impact of repeated cosmetic procedures that left her feeling more flawed rather than less. The grief associated with childlessness. The loneliness she experienced within her marriage. The loss of work and identity. The exhaustion associated with chronic insomnia and menopause.

Together, these experiences formed an interconnected autobiographical narrative organised around a central expectation: “There is something fundamentally wrong with me.”

Within NeuroAffective-CBT, this process is conceptualised as NeuroAffective Narrative Reconsolidation (NNR).

NNR describes the gradual revision of emotionally organised autobiographical narratives through repeated experiences of physiological regulation, emotional safety, cognitive flexibility, and corrective interpersonal experience. Rather than focusing solely on changing individual beliefs, NNR seeks to reorganise the broader narrative structures through which people understand themselves, others, and the world. This understanding is consistent with contemporary theories of memory reconsolidation and emotional learning, which suggest that previously established emotional meanings remain open to revision when reactivated under conditions that permit new learning (Lane et al., 2015; Brewin, 2014; Arntz, 2012).

For Sophie, this process unfolded gradually rather than dramatically.

There was no single transformative session. Instead, countless small moments accumulated. She noticed herself remaining on camera for slightly longer during online meetings. She accepted invitations that she would previously have declined. She looked in the mirror without immediately searching for defects. She found herself walking outside without feeling compelled to hide behind sunglasses or heavy make-up. Most importantly, she became increasingly able to experience shame without allowing it to define her identity.

One session illustrated this particularly clearly. While discussing the childhood shop incident, Sophie paused and quietly said,

“I think I spent most of my life trying to prove that they were wrong.” ..“Maybe I don’t need to prove anything anymore.”

This moment was not interpreted as the disappearance of shame. Nor did it represent the complete resolution of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. Instead, it reflected a profound reorganisation of meaning. The memory remained but its emotional authority had changed. Rather than functioning as unquestioned evidence of personal defectiveness, it became recognised as one painful chapter within a much larger life story.

From that point onwards, the memory could be held with compassion rather than certainty.

The Emergence of the Integrated-Self

Throughout therapy, the central therapeutic aim was never to eliminate unwanted emotions or construct an idealised version of the self.

Instead, NA-CBT sought to create the neuroaffective conditions in which Sophie’s Integrated-Self could emerge more consistently.

The Integrated Self does not represent perfection, permanent happiness, or the absence of vulnerability.

Rather, it reflects an increasingly coherent experience of identity in which physiology, affect, cognition, behaviour, autobiographical memory, and interpersonal experience become more harmoniously aligned.

Within this state, emotional experiences remain meaningful without becoming overwhelming.

Thoughts remain influential without becoming absolute. The body becomes a source of information rather than threat. Relationships become opportunities for connection rather than continual evaluation. Most importantly, identity becomes less organised around protection and more organised around authenticity.

This distinction proved fundamental. Early in therapy, Sophie experienced herself almost entirely through the lens of shame. Later, she increasingly recognised shame as one emotional experience among many. The difference was profound as she no longer experienced what she felt as who she was. Instead, emotions became experiences that could be observed, understood, and responded to with increasing flexibility.

As the Integrated-Self became more accessible, behavioural change emerged naturally rather than through constant effort. Mirror checking reduced,  avoidance diminished and social engagement gradually increased. Self-care became motivated less by fear of judgement and more by genuine compassion for herself. Perhaps most significantly, therapy no longer revolved around repairing a defective person.

Instead, it focused on creating the biological, psychological, and relational conditions that allowed an already existing, though previously obscured, sense of self to become increasingly available.

Pause for Curiosity

Perhaps psychological change is not always about becoming someone new.

Perhaps it is about reducing the neuroaffective conditions that prevent people from becoming who they have always had the capacity to be.

Discussion

Sophie’s therapeutic journey illustrates one of the central propositions of NeuroAffective-CBT: the recurrence of psychological symptoms does not necessarily indicate that previous therapy has been unsuccessful. Rather, it may reflect profound changes in the neuroaffective context within which previously acquired psychological skills are now expected to operate.

Although Sophie retained many of the cognitive insights developed during her previous course of CBT, years of accumulating physiological, relational, occupational, and emotional adversity had fundamentally altered the conditions under which these skills were required. Menopause, persistent insomnia, occupational loss, social isolation, repeated cosmetic procedures, prolonged litigation, and unresolved grief collectively increased her neuroaffective load, reducing psychological flexibility despite preserved cognitive understanding.

Rather than conceptualising this deterioration as therapeutic failure, NA-CBT understood it as evidence that cognition does not operate independently of physiology and affect. Cognitive restructuring, behavioural experiments, and exposure remain essential components of evidence-based treatment (Beck, 1976, 2021; Clark & Beck, 2010). However, the effectiveness of these interventions may be influenced by the physiological and affective state within which they occur.

This broader formulation complements established cognitive behavioural models of Body Dysmorphic Disorder, which emphasise dysfunctional appearance beliefs, selective attention, mirror checking, avoidance, reassurance seeking, and safety behaviours in maintaining distress (Veale, 2004; Veale & Neziroglu, 2010; Phillips, 2005; Wilhelm et al., 2013). Rather than replacing these well-established models, NeuroAffective-CBT seeks to extend them by incorporating physiological regulation, predictive processing, and affective neuroscience into psychological formulation.

From this perspective, body dysmorphic symptoms are understood not only as products of maladaptive cognition and behaviour but also as emerging within an integrated body-brain system continuously attempting to predict, interpret, and respond to potential threat (Friston, 2010; Barrett, 2017). The brain’s primary evolutionary task is not objective reasoning but anticipation in the service of protection. Consequently, alterations in physiological regulation may significantly influence the intensity, persistence, and credibility of appearance-related beliefs.

Central to this formulation is the concept of neuroaffective load (Mirea, 2018). Unlike broader notions of stress, neuroaffective load refers to the cumulative interaction between physiological dysregulation, affective activation, cognitive burden, interpersonal adversity, and environmental demands. Sophie’s presentation illustrated how multiple seemingly independent difficulties gradually converged to create conditions in which shame, self-criticism, and avoidance became increasingly dominant.

The introduction of the TED (Tiredโ€“Exerciseโ€“Diet) framework provided a practical means of addressing these physiological influences within psychotherapy (Mirea, 2023, 2025a, 2025b). Importantly, TED is not intended to replace specialist medical, nutritional, or exercise interventions. Rather, it offers psychologists a psychologically informed framework through which physiological regulation becomes part of collaborative formulation. Where clinically appropriate, clients may be supported to access relevant healthcare professionals while psychotherapy continues to address the emotional and cognitive implications of physiological dysregulation.

One of the distinguishing features of NA-CBT is its explicit rejection of a traditional mind-body dichotomy. Rather than viewing biological and psychological processes as separate domains, NA-CBT conceptualises emotional experience as emerging through continuous interactions between physiology, affect, cognition, autobiographical memory, and interpersonal relationships (Damasio, 1999; Barrett, 2017; Siegel, 2012). The Body-Brain-Affect Triangle offers one way of organising these interactions clinically, helping therapists and clients appreciate how changes in one component inevitably influence the others.

Another important contribution concerns the distinction between affect and interpretation. Throughout therapy, Sophie gradually learned to differentiate immediate emotional signals from the meanings subsequently assigned to them. This distinction allowed shame to become an emotional experience rather than a fixed identity. Increasingly, she recognised that intense emotional reactions were not necessarily accurate reflections of present reality but understandable responses generated within a nervous system organised around protection rather than objective perception (LeDoux, 2015; Panksepp, 1998).

These developments created the conditions for NeuroAffective Narrative Reconsolidation. Rather than focusing exclusively on modifying individual cognitions, therapy facilitated the gradual reorganisation of emotionally significant autobiographical narratives. Memories that had long functioned as unquestioned evidence of personal defectiveness became integrated into a broader, more compassionate life story. This process aligns conceptually with contemporary understandings of memory reconsolidation and emotional learning, suggesting that autobiographical narratives remain open to revision when reactivated under conditions of sufficient emotional safety and physiological regulation (Lane et al., 2015; Brewin, 2014; Arntz, 2012).

Perhaps most importantly, the therapeutic goal extended beyond symptom reduction. While reductions in appearance preoccupation, avoidance, and self-criticism were clinically meaningful, they were understood as consequences of a broader developmental process rather than endpoints in themselves. The overarching aim became the emergence of an Integrated-Self, a coherent experience of identity in which physiology, affect, cognition, autobiographical memory, behaviour, and relationships become increasingly aligned (Mirea, 2018).

Throughout treatment, one recurring question appeared to organise both formulation and intervention:

What might be maintaining your neuroaffective load, and what might help reduce it?

Although deceptively simple, this question repeatedly redirected attention away from self-blame and towards collaborative curiosity. It also proved highly transportable across therapeutic goals, helping distinguish behaviours that maintained neuroaffective load from those that gradually reduced it. In Sophie’s therapy, this distinction was represented visually through a traditional CBT vicious cycle alongside a complementary “virtuous flower”, illustrating the multiple pathways through which physiological regulation, valued action, behavioural flexibility, and compassionate self-care gradually supported psychological recovery.

Limitations

As a single case study, the present report cannot determine the efficacy of NeuroAffective-CBT or establish causal relationships between specific interventions and clinical outcomes. Improvements observed throughout therapy likely reflected the combined influence of multiple therapeutic, interpersonal, and contextual factors.

Accordingly, the present case should be viewed as an illustration of clinical formulation rather than evidence of treatment superiority. Future research should evaluate NA-CBT across a range of clinical presentations using controlled methodologies, examining both symptom outcomes and broader indicators of physiological regulation, emotional flexibility, identity integration, and quality of life.

Future Directions

Future developments within NeuroAffective-CBT should focus on systematic empirical evaluation of the model across anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, mood disorders, trauma-related presentations, and personality difficulties. In particular, research exploring interactions between physiological regulation, affective processing, and cognitive flexibility may further clarify the mechanisms through which neuroaffective load influences psychological functioning. Finally, future publications may expand the present work by exploring the theoretical foundations of NA-CBT in greater depth, alongside additional clinical illustrations across diverse diagnostic presentations.

Conclusion

This case study has presented NeuroAffective-CBT (NA-CBT) through the treatment of a woman with longstanding Body Dysmorphic Disorder whose difficulties evolved within the context of cumulative physiological, developmental, relational, and emotional adversity. Rather than conceptualising symptom recurrence as evidence of therapeutic failure, NA-CBT proposed that previously acquired psychological skills had become increasingly difficult to access because the neuroaffective conditions supporting their effective use had fundamentally changed.

Throughout therapy, formulation extended beyond cognition alone to consider the continuous interaction between physiology, affect, predictive brain processes, autobiographical memory, behaviour, and interpersonal experience. Concepts such as neuroaffective load, the TED (Tiredโ€“Exerciseโ€“Diet) framework, the Bodyโ€“Brainโ€“Affect Triangle, and NeuroAffective Narrative Reconsolidation provided an integrated framework through which Sophie’s presentation became increasingly understandable and clinically meaningful.

Importantly, NA-CBT does not seek to replace established cognitive behavioural models. Instead, it builds upon the considerable strengths of contemporary CBT by incorporating developments from affective neuroscience, predictive processing, embodied cognition, attachment theory, and lifestyle medicine into psychological formulation and intervention (Beck, 2021; Barrett, 2017; Friston, 2010). In doing so, it offers clinicians an expanded framework for understanding how physiological regulation, emotional processing, and cognitive flexibility continuously influence one another.

Perhaps the most significant shift within therapy concerned its ultimate aim.

Rather than striving simply to reduce symptoms, challenge distorted cognitions, or eliminate distress, treatment sought to create the biological, psychological, and relational conditions in which Sophie’s Integrated-Self could emerge more consistently. As neuroaffective load gradually reduced, shame became less defining, autobiographical memories acquired new meaning, behavioural flexibility increased, and compassion gradually replaced self-protection as the organising principle of her relationship with herself.

At its heart, NeuroAffective-CBT invites clinicians to become curious. Curious about the relationship between body and mind. Curious about the interaction between physiology and cognition. Curious about how affect shapes prediction before conscious thought has emerged. Curious about the stories people carry about themselves and the neuroaffective conditions that allow those stories to evolve.

Clinical Reflections

This case illustrates how broadening formulation beyond cognition alone may enrich clinical understanding without abandoning the principles of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. The concepts presented within NA-CBT are intended to complementโ€”not replaceโ€”existing evidence-based CBT models. Throughout treatment, curiosity functioned not merely as a therapeutic attitude but as an active clinical intervention, encouraging therapist and client to explore how physiology, affect, cognition, memory, and relationships continuously interacted.

For practising clinicians, the recurring questionโ€” What might be maintaining neuroaffective load, and what might help reduce it? โ€”may provide a simple yet clinically useful organising principle that readily translates into collaborative formulation, treatment planning, behavioural goals, and relapse prevention.

Disclaimer

This case study is intended solely for educational and professional discussion purposes. It does not constitute clinical guidance, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Therapeutic approaches described should be implemented only by appropriately trained professionals within their scope of competence and adapted to the individual needs of each client. Readers are encouraged to consult relevant clinical guidelines, current evidence, and professional supervision when applying the concepts presented within this paper.

The image used in this article is an illustrative image only. This image is AI-generated and does not depict the actual client. It has been created solely to reflect the themes of this anonymised case study.

Ethics and Anonymisation Statement

All identifying client information has been altered to protect anonymity. The case has been substantially anonymised, and contextual details have been modified where necessary to minimise the possibility of identification while preserving the clinical relevance of the formulation. Informed consent was obtained for the use of anonymised clinical material for educational and dissemination purposes.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association.

Arntz, A. (2012). Imagery rescripting as a therapeutic technique: Review of clinical trials, basic studies, and research agenda. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3(2), 189โ€“208. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.024211

Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015). Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(7), 419โ€“429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3950

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.

Beck, J. S. (2021). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Brewin, C. R. (2014). Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: Foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 69โ€“97. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033722

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181โ€“204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477

Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: Science and practice. Guilford Press.

Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace.

Elsey, J. W. B., Van Ast, V. A., & Kindt, M. (2018). Human memory reconsolidation: A guiding framework and critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 89, 1โ€“19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.008

Firth, J., Solmi, M., Wootton, R. E., et al. (2020). A meta-review of lifestyle psychiatry: The role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 19(3), 360โ€“380. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20773

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127โ€“138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787

Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., & Ciarrochi, J. (2022). A process-based approach to psychological diagnosis and treatment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4), 343โ€“350. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221089356

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 37โ€“50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618772296

Hohwy, J. (2020). New directions in predictive processing. Mind & Language, 35(2), 209โ€“223. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12281

Khalsa, S. S., Adolphs, R., Cameron, O. G., et al. (2018). Interoception and mental health: A roadmap. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(6), 501โ€“513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004

Lane, R. D., Ryan, L., Nadel, L., & Greenberg, L. S. (2015). Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000041

LeDoux, J. E. (2015). Anxious: Using the brain to understand and treat fear and anxiety. Viking.

Marx, W., Moseley, G., Berk, M., & Jacka, F. (2017). Nutritional psychiatry: The present state of the evidence. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 76(4), 427โ€“436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665117002026

Mirea, D. (2018, October 19). The underlayers of NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ. NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ. https://neuroaffectivecbt.com/2018/10/19/the-underlayers-of-neuroaffective-cbt/

Mirea, D. (2023, July 18). Tired, Exercise and Diet your way out of trouble: TED’s your best friend. NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ. https://neuroaffectivecbt.com/2023/07/18/teds-your-best-friend/

Mirea, D. (2025, December 10). TED in NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ: An applied self-regulation framework for enhancing emotional well-being through sleep, movement, and nutrition. NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ. https://neuroaffectivecbt.com/2025/12/10/ted-in-neuroaffective-cbt-an-applied-self-regulation-framework-for-enhancing-emotional-well-being-through-sleep-movement-and-nutrition/

Mirea, D. (2025, December 17). The use of lifestyle interventions in psychotherapy. NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ. https://neuroaffectivecbt.com/2025/12/17/the-use-of-lifestyle-interventions-in-psychotherapy/

Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002โ€“1005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136930

Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.

Pessoa, L. (2017). A network model of the emotional brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(5), 357โ€“371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.002

Phillips, K. A. (2005). The broken mirror: Understanding and treating body dysmorphic disorder (Rev. ed.). Oxford University Press.

Phillips, K. A., Didie, E. R., Feusner, J., & Wilhelm, S. (2008). Body dysmorphic disorder: Treating an underrecognized disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(9), 1111โ€“1118. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040500

Seth, A. K., & Friston, K. J. (2016). Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1708), 20160007. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0007

Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Veale, D. (2004). Advances in a cognitive behavioural model of body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image, 1(1), 113โ€“125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00009-3

Veale, D., & Neziroglu, F. (2010). Body dysmorphic disorder: A treatment manual. Wiley-Blackwell.

Wilhelm, S., Phillips, K. A., & Steketee, G. (2013). Cognitive behavioral therapy for body dysmorphic disorder: A treatment manual. Guilford Press.

The Use of Lifestyle Interventions in Psychotherapy

Daniel Mirea (December, 2025)
|The NeuroAffective-CBTยฎ Journal |ย 

Why Sleep, Movement, and Metabolic Stability Matter in NeuroAffective-CBT

Many clients enter psychotherapy believing their distress is โ€œall in the mind.โ€ From a NeuroAffective-CBT (NA-CBT) perspective, however, this assumption is incomplete. Mind and body form a single regulatory system, and emotional suffering often emerges from how physiological states interact with learned affective patterns.

NA-CBT is grounded in the idea that the brainโ€™s core function is prediction and protection. The nervous system constantly asks: Am I safe? What is about to happen? How bad could it be?

These predictions are shaped not only by thoughts and beliefs, but also by bodily signalsโ€”sleep, movement, metabolic stability, and neurochemical balance.

For example, a client who is sleep-deprived may interpret neutral feedback from a colleague as criticism, as the nervous system biases perception toward threat, triggering anxiety or defensiveness.

When physiological states are unstable, prediction systems become more threat-sensitive. Neutral events are more likely to be experienced as dangerous, shame responses are triggered more quickly, and emotions escalate faster and last longer. This is why NA-CBT integrates TEDโ€”Tiredness (sleep/rest), Exercise (movement/fitness), and Diet (metabolism/nutrition)โ€”as a core stabilisation framework within psychotherapy.

TED is not a wellness add-on. It is often the foundation that allows cognitive, emotional, and relational work to become tolerable and effective.


NeuroAffective-CBT and the Emerging โ€œFourth Waveโ€ CBT

Within the broader CBT tradition, NA-CBT can be understood as part of an emerging, process-based fourth wave, integrating neuroscience, physiology, lifestyle science, and embodied experience into psychological treatment.

While earlier waves of CBT focused on behaviour, cognition, and acceptance, NA-CBT places affective underlayers such as shame, self-loathing, and internal threat, at the centre of formulation and intervention. Affect is treated as precognitive, fast, and survival-driven; cognition is the meaning-making layer built on top of it.

Central to this model is the Bodyโ€“Brainโ€“Affect triangle:

  • physiological states shape emotional and cognitive processes,
  • emotions influence thoughts and behaviour,
  • thoughts and behaviours, in turn, reshape physiology.

Within this system, TED functions as the physiological regulation arm of NA-CBT, reducing background volatility so deeper psychological learning can occur.

Therefore, the central aim of NA-CBT is helping clients distinguish between:

  • raw affect (the bodyโ€™s immediate threat or pain signal), and
  • interpretation (the meaning the mind assigns to that signal)

When these collapse into one another, clients experience emotions as overwhelming, self-defining, or dangerous. TED helps slow this process down by first asking: what is the body signalling right now, and is the reaction accurately calibrated?


Physiological Drivers of Emotional Dysregulation

When sleep is poor, movement is minimal, or blood glucose is unstable, clients often experience:

  • heightened anxiety or irritability
  • emotional reactivity and rumination
  • intensified shame and self-criticism
  • reduced tolerance for exposure, uncertainty, or intimacy

From an NA-CBT perspective, these are not failures of willpower or insight. They are signs that the nervous system is operating under strain.

TED aims for sufficiency rather than optimisation. The goal is not perfect habits, but a stable internal environment that reduces threat sensitivity and supports emotional regulation as exemplified in the three case studies below.

Case examples (TED in action)

Case 1: Anxiety amplified by fatigue and metabolic instability

A client with panic-like anxiety noticed that their most intense fear spikes occurred late morning after poor sleep, skipped breakfast, and significantly increased caffeine and sugar intake. Using the TED self-check, they recognised that the fear was only partly warranted and heavily fuelled by tiredness and metabolic volatility. Addressing these factors firstโ€”reducing caffeine and sugar, introducing appropriate vitamins and minerals where indicated, and adding a daily morning walkโ€”made later exposure work possible rather than overwhelming.

Case 2: Shame-driven depression softened through movement

Another client with chronic self-loathing noticed that shame spikes reliably followed long sedentary days. Short โ€œexercise snacksโ€ were introduced not as fitness goals, but as identity repair behaviours (โ€œI am someone who cares for my nervous systemโ€). Tracking the relationship between movement, mood, and self-attacks led to reduced shame intensity before deeper cognitive restructuring was attempted.

Case 3: Relationship reactivity reduced through physiological regulation

A client experiencing explosive arguments discovered that intense reactions often followed long workdays, exhaustion, poor sleep, and minimal movement. The TED self-check helped distinguish warranted relational frustration from unwarranted threat amplification, enabling repair conversations instead of escalation.


Assessment and formulation: the Pendulum-Effect model in context

NA-CBT assessment extends beyond symptoms and surface cognitions to explore developmental affective learning.

A common pattern seen in clients with chronic shame, anxiety, or perfectionism involves early experiences such as: parents were hard to satisfy; poor school results or mistakes led to angry remarks, humiliation, withdrawal of warmth, or visible disappointment.

Over time, the child learns that performance determines safety and acceptance.

Core affect installed: shame

In this environment, a core affect of shame becomes installed. Shame functions as a predictive alarm: โ€œIf I fail, I will be exposed, rejected, or humiliated.โ€

This learning is not primarily cognitive. It is subcortical, embodied, and anticipatory. As adults, these individuals often experience shame spikes before anything has gone wrong. Situations involving evaluation, feedback, uncertainty, or rest activate the same prediction system.

Trigger pattern: most situations where failure is predicted (i.e., imaginal), not necessarily occurring, activate shame and internal threat.


The Pendulum-Effect: how shame maintains distress

NA-CBT uses the Pendulum-Effect formulation to map how clients attempt to manage shame. Three poles typically emerge:

  • Overcompensation:
    Perfectionism, overworking, people-pleasing, hyper-preparation, harsh self-criticism as โ€œmotivationโ€.
  • Capitulation:
    Low mood, hopelessness, self-loathing, โ€œWhatโ€™s the point?โ€, giving up.
  • Avoidance:
    Social or professional withdrawal, procrastination, numbing behaviours, reassurance-seeking, distraction, emotional withdrawal.

Although these strategies look different, they share the same function: protecting against the felt experience of shame. Over time, however, they reinforce it.

Physiological vulnerabilities, poor sleep, low movement, metabolic instability, often increase the amplitude of the pendulum, making swings more intense and harder to interrupt. This is where TED becomes clinically central.


The TED Self-Check

A 30-second reset you can use anytime emotions start to spike

When you feel anxious, irritable, flat, overwhelmed, or stuck in self-criticism, pause. Before analysing yourself or the situation, gently run through these steps, without judgement.

1. What hurts right now โ€” and where?

What is the actual pain signal in this moment?

Name the felt experience, not the story:

  • tight chest
  • heat in the face
  • drop in the stomach
  • lump in the throat

This separates raw affect from interpretation.


2. Is this emotional reaction warranted, unwarranted, or warranted to a degree?

Given the situation, does this intensity fit the facts, or is threat being amplified?

You are not asking โ€œIs this emotion bad?โ€
You are asking โ€œIs my nervous system accurately calibrated right now?โ€

Example:

  • Event: My boss says the presentation needs more work.
  • Interpretation: โ€œThis is terrible. I canโ€™t tolerate this. Iโ€™m being shamed.โ€
  • Affect: Sharp shame spike, threat response.
  • Warrant check:
    • Some discomfort is warranted (feedback can sting).
    • The intensity of shame is only partly warranted.
    • A shame underlayer is amplifying the reaction.

This step creates psychological space without invalidating emotion.


3. TED check: what might be fuelling the spike?

T โ€” Tiredness
How rested am I right now?

E โ€” Exercise
How much have I moved today?

D โ€” Diet
How steady is my energy and nourishment?

When the body is steadier, emotional calibration improves, and meaning-making becomes fairer!


Behavioural experiments and exposure work (with physiological support)

In NA-CBT, exposure is framed as updating predictions, not forcing fear away.

For shame-based threat systems, exposure often involves:

  • allowing imperfection,
  • tolerating feedback without immediate self-attack,
  • staying present while shame sensations rise and fall.

TED is crucial here. When physiology is unstable, exposure can feel overwhelming or retraumatising. When the system is steadier through regular exercise, improved diet and sleep, clients can remain succesfully within the window of tolerance, allowing corrective learning to occur.

Behavioural experiments might include:

  • submitting work that is โ€œgood enough,โ€
  • asking a question without over-preparing,
  • delaying reassurance-seeking,
  • allowing small mistakes without immediate repair.

Each experiment tests the old prediction: โ€œIf Iโ€™m not perfect, Iโ€™ll be shamed or rejected.โ€


Shame and self-loathing repair

Because shame is the core affect, NA-CBT does not rely on cognitive restructuring alone. Repair occurs across multiple levels:

  • Affective: staying with bodily shame sensations without collapse or attack
  • Narrative: identifying internalised parental voices and shame-based meanings
  • Relational: experiencing being seen without humiliation
  • Physiological: reducing baseline threat sensitivity through TED

Over time, clients develop a non-shaming internal regulatorโ€”an Integrated Self capable of noticing shame without obeying it.


Relapse prevention and self-regulation planning

Relapse prevention in NA-CBT focuses on recognising early signs of pendulum acceleration, not eliminating emotion.

Clients learn to notice:

  • rising perfectionism or avoidance,
  • faster shame activation,
  • disrupted sleep, reduced movement, irregular eating.

Here, the TED self-check becomes a long-term inner compass. Returning to TED (i.e., the fundamentals – better sleep, exercise, better diet) during periods of stress often prevents full relapse by stabilising physiology before old affective loops take over.

Setbacks are reframed as signals, not failures: โ€œMy nervous system is under strain; what support does it need right now?โ€


Conclusion

Within NeuroAffective-CBT, lifestyle regulation, affective formulation, exposure, and identity repair are not separate tracks. They are interlocking components of a single system aimed at recalibrating threat, softening shame dominance, and restoring psychological flexibility. TED does not replace depth work, in fact it makes deeper work possible. As such, the TED and Pendulum-Effect formulation modules in particular, can be used in conjunction with any school of psychotherapy, as illustrated in the case examples above. They offer a transdiagnostic framework for understanding how physiology, affect, and behaviour interact to maintain or reduce psychological distress.

NA-CBT is not necessarily a short-term protocol but a lifelong self-regulation compass. When emotions surge, clients are encouraged to return to three simple questions:

  • How tired am I?
  • How much have I moved?
  • How steady is my nourishment?

By repeatedly stabilising physiology first, clients gain greater freedom in how they think, feel, and act, supporting deeper emotional regulation, reduced shame, and more integrated identity over time.

Medical and Nutritional Disclaimer

The information on this page is provided for educational and therapeutic context only and is not intended as medical, nutritional, or prescribing advice. NeuroAffective-CBT practitioners do not diagnose medical conditions or prescribe supplements outside of a comprehensive assessment and only if individual core profession allows it. As such, any discussion of nutrition, micronutrients, or lifestyle factors is offered as part of a psychological assessment formulation and should not replace consultation with a qualified medical professional. Clients are encouraged to discuss supplements, medications, and health concerns with their GP or relevant healthcare provider.